Posts

Showing posts from April, 2011

Your smartphone is very powerful!

It seems that most people, especially present day young ones, have problems understanding my Apollo 11 illustration .  I will try again with another example. When the most well-known bank in my city had a million customers, it had 50+ branches.  Almost every customer operated a savings account where each was given a savings book.  Every deposit or withdrawal transaction was printed as a one-line entry in the book with the latest balance in the second last column.  (The last column was a comments field.) Every teller in the branch had an IBM terminal.  Customers would fill up and sign a form to withdraw money, or just present cash to deposit.  The teller would open the savings book to the page where the last entry was and insert the book into the printer next to the terminal.  She would push the book all the way in.  When she hit the key to print, the central mainframe computer would send out the exact number of line-feeds so that the latest tr...

And the power goes to...

Probably something like 80% to 90% of the new found computing power goes into the graphical user interface. This is on personal computers as well as mobile phones. The sleek graphics painted in a window that we take for granted require billions and billions of computing cycles, repeating and repeating every time something on screen changes. The graphical UI is obviously a great enabler. It allows lay people to use the computer where previously only trained professionals could. However, do not let this be a distraction. The fact that a small fraction of an iPhone powered the complete operations of a bank or sent men to the moon and back cannot be erased. And it is repeatable, with great ease.

Is it so difficult to appreciate that there are things we do not know that we do not know?

(I will justify shortly that) to most people, the set of things in the world is divided as follows (not to scale): Things I do not know Things that I know Figure 1 For the past thirty years or so, I have always assumed that the set of things is as follows (not to scale): Things (I know that) I do not know Things that I know Things that I do not know that I do not know Figure 2 I spend most of my waking hours tranfering things from the yellow zone to the pink zone.  It is only too easy to lapse into Figure 1 thinking if I lower my guard. Why do I think most people think like in Figure 1? I draw this conclusion from the ridicule poured on Donald Rumsfeld from almost 100% of the press. Some thought it was poetry ! The BBC called it bizzare .  I don't know whether to believe that the British Plain English Campaign doesn't understand what Mr Rumsfeld was saying.  It appears that people do not realize there is a Figure 2. To me what Mr Rumsfeld sa...